Monday’s best bets, by Chris Cook
One of the more vexed questions in modern betting concerns how often bookmakers are willing to restrict winning customers or close down their accounts altogether. Anecdotal evidence suggests this is happening more and more often, to the point that you often hear punters complaining that firms are trying to make it impossible to be a long-term winner, while betting companies insist that only a tiny percentage of punters are affected.
The campaigners at Justice For Punters have now published data which offers some sort of insight into the extent of the problem. Evidently, it was gathered by the market research company Pollfish for a third party who handed the raw data on to JFP.
The sample size is measured in hundreds and there are other imperfections in the data available but this remains one of the very few insights available about the extent of the problem for your average sports bettors. The conclusion reached is that 4% of customers have had experience of a closed account or restrictions being placed on their access to bookmaker promotions, rising to 9% or 10% for more experienced punters.
Any betting industry insider is likely to say that those figures should not be relied upon and overstate the problem. Sky Bet’s chief executive said in January that his firm restricts only 3% of its customers and only closes accounts for reasons of social responsibility or fraud. Another stab at getting a grip on the extent of this problem was made by the Horserace Bettors Forum in 2016, when it estimated that 20,000 accounts of British punters had been closed in six months.
Justice For Punters’ analysis is here, for those who are interested. Until a more wide-ranging survey is undertaken by, say, the Gambling Commission, this is one of the few insights we’re likely to get.
So it’s heavy going at Ffos Las in December. What else is new? Among those who can cope with that ground is Steel Native (3.20), who I fancied at the same track last month when he ran into a handicap blot but finished miles clear of the third.
He gets another go from just 3lb higher with Tom Scudamore aboard once more and I’ll go in again at 5-2. I find the opposition unthreatening but it’s the sort of race in which one of them might run way above its recent form.
I see plenty of potential improvement for Carole’s Vigilante (1.45) as he makes his first start for Harry Whittington, having had a wind operation in the summer. The chestnut has looked a chaser from the outset and can prove well handicapped in this sphere, having won one from three over hurdles last winter. We are offered 5-1 in this eight-runner field.
Pick of the card at Plumpton could be Chivers (3.05), available at 2-1 having opened at double that with at least one firm. He was out of place in the novice chase won by Kalashnikov here a fortnight ago but handicap chasing could be for him and an extra half-mile will help. He has joined Gary Moore on a mark that ought to be beatable, in view of his Flat form, although he was winless over obstacles for his former trainer, Daniel Steele, who still owns him.
As 2018 draws to a close….
… we’re asking readers to make an end of year or ongoing contribution in support of The Guardian’s independent journalism.
Three years ago we set out to make The Guardian sustainable by deepening our relationship with our readers. The same technologies that connected us with a global audience had also shifted advertising revenues away from news publishers. We decided to seek an approach that would allow us to keep our journalism open and accessible to everyone, regardless of where they live or what they can afford.
More than one million readers have now supported our independent, investigative journalism through contributions, membership or subscriptions, which has played such an important part in helping The Guardian overcome a perilous financial situation globally. We want to thank you for all of your support. But we have to maintain and build on that support for every year to come.
Sustained support from our readers enables us to continue pursuing difficult stories in challenging times of political upheaval, when factual reporting has never been more critical. The Guardian is editorially independent – our journalism is free from commercial bias and not influenced by billionaire owners, politicians or shareholders. No one edits our editor. No one steers our opinion. This is important because it enables us to give a voice to those less heard, challenge the powerful and hold them to account. Readers’ support means we can continue bringing The Guardian’s independent journalism to the world.
Please make an end of year contribution today to help us deliver the independent journalism the world needs for 2019 and beyond.
Support The Guardian from as little as $1 – and it only takes a minute.